V-Count vs Xovis:
Two Sensor Makers, Two Philosophies
Xovis builds excellent 3D sensors, best known in airports. V-Count builds AI sensors plus the complete BoostBI analytics platform — one vendor, one contract, insights included. Here is how they compare for retail and commercial deployments.
Book a Free Demo →Complete Platform vs. Sensor-First Ecosystem
Both companies design and manufacture their own sensors — a real distinction in this market. The difference is what happens after the count.
The Full Comparison Table
A transparent look at what each vendor offers, based on public information.
| Feature | V-Count | Xovis |
|---|---|---|
| Company Type | ✓ Manufacturer of sensors + analytics platform | Swiss sensor manufacturer, flow-analytics software |
| Core Market | ✓ Retail, malls, airports — balanced portfolio | Airports first; retail via partners |
| Claimed Accuracy | ✓ Up to 99%, validated at your own entrance | High accuracy, well regarded in the industry |
| Analytics Platform | ✓ BoostBI included: 200+ KPIs, AI Sales Coach | ✕ No retail dashboard — fully dependent on partner software; no mobile app, no AI sales coach |
| Total Cost of Ownership | ✓ Sensor + software from one vendor, public pricing | ✕ Premium sensors, plus integrator and software layers |
| Privacy Model | ✓ Edge AI processing, no PII stored, GDPR-ready | Also edge-based — both stronger than camera/video vendors |
| Deployment | ✓ Self-install in minutes, PoE, auto-provisioned | Typically integrator-led projects |
| Support | ✓ Direct manufacturer support | ✕ Via partners in many regions |
| Demographics | ✓ Gender + age recognition, processed on-device | ✕ Gender only — no age estimation |
| Staff Exclusion | ✓ Validated staff exclusion, covered in the published accuracy audit | ✕ Staff-exclusion accuracy commonly reported below 90% |
| Counting in Darkness | ✓ Counts in total darkness (0 lux) with active IR sensing | ✕ Needs a minimum of ~2 lux — cannot count in total darkness |
| Best Fit | ✓ Teams that want counting + analytics working day one | Large airports and integrator-managed projects |
Comparison reflects publicly available information as of July 2026. Product capabilities change; verify current specifications with each vendor.
Six Reasons Buyers Pick V-Count
Where the single-vendor model pays off in practice.
One Vendor, Whole Stack
Sensor, platform, and support from one company. No integrator margin, no finger-pointing between hardware and software vendors when something needs fixing.
Retail KPIs Out of the Box
Conversion, capture rate, dwell, queue, occupancy, demographics — 200+ KPIs live in BoostBI the day sensors go up. No custom dashboard project required.
Up to 99% Accuracy
V-Count rates Nano AI at up to 99% for entrance counting and validates it with a reference count at your own door. Both vendors make strong claims; test both on your own traffic.
Transparent Pricing
Sensors $299–799 and BoostBI from $9/month, published on the website. Budgeting a 200-store rollout takes minutes, not a quote cycle.
AI That Recommends
BoostBI’s AI Sales Coach turns traffic patterns into staffing and marketing recommendations — analytics that tells you what to do, not just what happened.
Faster Time to Value
PoE self-install and cloud auto-provisioning mean a store counts within minutes. Integrator-led projects typically measure deployment in weeks.
V-Count vs Xovis: Your Questions Answered
Compare on Your Own Traffic
Run a free pilot: V-Count’s sensors (up to 99% accurate) with BoostBI analytics, live on your entrances.